iRant

By Shamus Posted Wednesday Apr 12, 2006

Filed under: Rants 7 comments

Steven Den Beste takes Apple to task for their QuickTime installer. This hits a nerve with me, so I find I must add the following insightful commentary:

Yeah. Everything he said.

It’s too late to help Steven, but I want to mention that recently I managed to stumble on the page that let me install the Player and not ITunes. It never even mentioned iTunes during the process. It was shortly after getting this computer that I visited Lileks and tried to watch one of his home movies. The page I was sent to from there gave me just the player, not iTunes. I can’t find that particular page through Apple’s site though.

On my old computer I had iTunes, and it was every bit as annoying as Steven says. The various “helper” processes running in the background infuriated me. The worst was the iPod app. Why is this thing running by default? If the user doesn’t own an iPod, then this is just wasted memory, CPU cycles, hard drive space, and (worst of all) needless clutter in the list of running applications. If they DO have an iPod, well then wouldn’t they install the iPod software that came with the unit? There is no reason for this process to even exist, much less run in the background all the time.

But more important is the principle of the thing. Sure, the “helper” apps only take up a measly 6 meg of memory. I’m sure I can’t percieve the change in performance over 6 meg, but what if everyone did this? If every application grabbed 6 meg and added two processes to the soup, my computer would be an unusable mess with hundreds of processes clogging up the works. What makes Apple think they have the right to do this? What makes them so special?

iTunes is like a nest of bad weeds. The roots go deep, and no matter what you do you’ll never feel like you got them all. It’s worse than MediaPlayer by a long shot, which is really saying something. It’s like a race to the bottom with these two. Shameful.

And finally: I’m sick of the fights over file types between QT and MP as well. Each program tries to poach the file types native to the other player. Both are guilty of it, although QT earns my ire for the time it stole the MPEG associations and then was unable to play the files when I clicked on them. Very naughty.

 


 

Four-Sided

By Shamus Posted Wednesday Apr 12, 2006

Filed under: Tabletop Games 28 comments

When I was a teenager, four-sided roleplaying dice were made like this:

The faces were numbered. However, due to the shape of the die the face you “rolled” was the one facing the table. You figured out what you rolled by looking at the bottom edge and seeing what number was there. Confusingly, this meant that the side you rolled was the only one you couldn’t see and had every number on it except the one you rolled. That is, the “two” side had 1, 3, and 4 on it.

This struck me as a bit strange and counter-intuitive at the time. I was always unhappy with the design of the four-sided. My own thought was that the four-sided should use a different shape:

Take the standard 4 sided, then select any 2 perpendicular edges. Take these edges and move them away from each other a bit, which will make each face more of an acute isosceles triangle. You end up with this:

This will produce a four-sided solid suitable for rolling, with one side clearly facing more directly up than the others.

For whatever reason I lost interest in the game when I was about fifteen. I didn’t have anything to do with it until about 18 years later, when I started playing again in early 2005. However, I noticed the design of the four-sided has changed since I was a teen:

Now the tips are numbered, instead of the faces. I’ve been to the local geek store comic book and RPG shop and they don’t have any of the old style dice for sale. I can only conclude they don’t make them that way any more. I wonder when this happened? Knowing geeks, I bet it was a big deal, and I’m willing to go one further and bet there are old-school purists and holdouts out there who shun the new dice. I have no evidence of this, I’m just extrapolating. I know how we geeks can get.

It’s unexpected, since every other shape uses numbered faces instead of tips, but I think the new design is much more intuitive. I had my kids (ages 4, 6, and 8 ) roll them as a test, and they found the new dice to be far easier to understand. All of them understood the new ones, but only the middle child was able to figure out how to read the old style dice.

 


 

On the mend

By Shamus Posted Wednesday Apr 12, 2006

Filed under: Personal 0 comments

I was right, yesterday was the worst of it. Today I’m starting to feel better. By tomorrow I’ll be pointing at people who are getting sick and laughing. Looking forward to that.

Whew.

Yesterday’s posts were kina wierd. I think high fevers and drugs do not make for interesting posts.

 


 

Machine Overlords

By Shamus Posted Tuesday Apr 11, 2006

Filed under: Nerd Culture 1 comments

The Machine Overlords have a new design, which is nice. If they’re going to be running the place, the least they could do is run an attractive blog.

Dang robots. I don’t know why the scientists make them.

 


 

More malady and melodrama

By Shamus Posted Tuesday Apr 11, 2006

Filed under: Personal 0 comments

So here I am nursing some serious day five symptoms and I decide to watch disc 5 of Sugar, A Little Snow Fairy. In the first episode, Saga gets sick. As far as I can make out, her symptoms are:

  • Rosy cheeks.
  • Excessive adorableness

Judging by how people keep looking at me, I’m pretty sure I have something different.

 


 

Tokyo Terror

By Shamus Posted Tuesday Apr 11, 2006

Filed under: Nerd Culture 5 comments

Fledgling otaku saw the kawaii post from a few days ago and has responded in kind. Posting may be light over the next few days as the movie in question has utterly destroyed my mind.

Usually I’d embed the video here or post framegrabs, but in this case I won’t. I don’t think it would be right to play the video without first issuing a declaration of war.

The Japanese have translated madness itself into digital form and then televised it. I’m telling you: No good can come of this.

 


 

The cycle of sickness

By Shamus Posted Tuesday Apr 11, 2006

Filed under: Personal 3 comments

Day 1: I think I might be getting sick. Maybe. Feel funny.

Day 2: Dang. I’m sick. Bah. This isn’t so bad. I can take it.

Day 3: This is it. I’m going to die. I’m going to be one of those guys who snuffs it before reaching middle age. I wonder what my funeral will be like?

Day 4: I lament that I was ever brought into this world, for it is now my lot to endure these dark horrors. Life is a vast and joyless expanse of misery and suffering without meaning or merit.

Day 5: I am infected to the very soul. Each breath is an ordeal. Each moment a punishment. My heart may continue to beat, but it does so against my will.

Day 6: I think I’m on the mend. Whew. That was nasty.

Day 7: You’re getting sick? Tough break. Well, suck it up. Don’t be such a baby.