T w e n t y S i d e d
For the record, we’re not going to do thee whole game. This is a one-off thing. I think it yielded a lot of interesting conversations that dovetail nicely with what we’ve been saying about Spec Ops.
Link (YouTube) |
John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 3
 |
At the risk of repeating myself: Here is the full presentation. My comments with timestamps follow.
Link (YouTube) |
“You have paid the price for your lack of vision!”
16:50: “RAGE did feel a little stiff.”
He’s talking about the interactivity of Doom 3 versus how static Rage felt.
In Doom 3, there were moving lights and machinery all over the place. In every room it seemed like there was a set-piece industrial machine doing machine-stuff. If you love watching little assembly-line movies like I do then these were fun to watch. Lights moved. The computers were interactive. The televisions had shows on. There were in-world videogames. There were physics objects and other dynamic items.
In RAGE, very little moves. He said it feels “stiff”, but for me it felt “dead”. Gorgeous, but dead. The thing is: We’ve got this astounding megatexturing system, and a lot of times I think we wound up with it acting as a very expensive form of skybox.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 3”
John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 2
|
You know the drill by this point. Here is the full presentation at Quakecon 2012. My comments with timestamps follow. Note that I’m just watching the video, pausing to comment at points that I think are interesting or could use some clarification for the masses.
8:05: “Doom 3 still holds up.”
YES.
I’ve said before that this era was pretty much a turning point in graphics technology. Doom 3, Half-Life 2, World of Warcraft, Thief: Deadly Shadows*, and Far Cry. We can argue a bit about the true high point. Maybe you want to move it back to 2002 so you can include NOLF 2. Maybe you want to move it forward a year or two to include the likes of Half Life 2: Episode One, or Quake 4, or whatever. But the point stands that right here we hit a magical spot on the visuals vs. cost trade-off. Games could still be produced in two-year intervals, and they had just enough graphics that characters could emote. But they hadn’t yet dropped into the uncanny valley of photorealism or become so expensive that nothing short of mega-blockbusters could hope to turn a profit.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 2”
John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 1
Every year at Quakecon, id Technology Magician John Carmack gives the keynote address. As I did last year, I’m going to watch the whole speech and make a few notes and observances along the way. Unlike last year, the speech is over three hours long. So This might take a while. As of this writing, I haven’t listened to the whole thing yet.
Here is the full speech. I’ll link to individual timestamps below.
Link (YouTube) |
This video thumbnail is better than last year’s. It sort of looks like he’s about to cast magic missile.
1:40: “In the last year, we finally did ship Rage.”
My overly brief review of Rage is here.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “John Carmack 2012 Keynote Annotated:Part 1”
Spec Ops: The Line: The Thematic Ambush
Some games are famous for their gameplay. Or their artwork. Or a big plot twist. This game might be the first one where the big selling point is the theme. Spec Ops asks the question: What would happen if your typical action-game badass lived in a world with consequences?
Think about it. Yes, the answer is obvious, but it’s still something to behold.
I would encourage you to go into the game cold, without reading this post. I can’t talk about how well this works without revealing some of the tricks it uses, and those are better if you’re surprised. Some people (Reader Krellen says this a lot) point out that spoiling stories can be good. However, I’m not talking about spoiling the story. I’m talking about the way the game uses the genre itself against you, something which is conveyed mostly in gameplay mechanics.
In this post I’m not doing story spoilers, but thematic and mechanical spoilers. From this point on. As before, white text is me. Text in gold boxes is Taliesin.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “Spec Ops: The Line: The Thematic Ambush”
Spec Ops: The Line: The Art
I’m going to do something different with this review. I’m going to run this series with a guest commentator. Normally, text in gold boxes is for me, but in this case:
Hi! I’m Taliesin, who you may remember as being credited for buying Batman: Arkham City for Shamus. Because I have more money and generosity than good sense, and because I really like Spec Ops: The Line, I decided to buy it for him, in exchange for getting the chance to put my voice (text) out here by messing up his perfectly good review with my own comments. I’m bribing him shamelessly for my own fame and attention, and hey, it’s working!
Just remember: This text is me, the gold boxes are Taliesin. Try not to freak out about this. Also, this isn’t the dawn of some strange new “buy me games for posting rights” policy. I like the idea of doing a discussion-style review, and this seemed like a fun thing to try.
ANYWAY.
Everyone is talking about the unexpected tone and thematic elements of Spec Ops: The Line. I thought I’d mix things up by talking about something that’s getting overlooked in the conversation. In the past, one of my major complaints about modern shooters is their pervasive brown-ness. After playing SWTOR some time ago, I’ve come to refine my views a bit, and I think this focus on brown is actually missing the point.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “Spec Ops: The Line: The Art”
The Bro Shooter
 |
I am not a fan of the “bro-shooter” genre. I mean, obviously. I’m sure I’ve belabored this idea in the past. Rather than just raging against each game as it comes out, I generally ignore them, unless I hear that a title is trying something different or unexpected.
I’m using the broad version of the genre, one that includes games like Call of Duty, Gears of War, Killzone, Kane & Lynch, Homefront, and Far Cry 2. Some are cover-based, some aren’t. Some are real-world, some aren’t. Some are third-person, some are first-person. The term “bro shooter” isn’t a hard-and-fast category, but a sort of generic pejorative we throw at a game once it accumulates too many symptoms of the genre. We can argue about edge cases like Mass Effect or haggle over why Half-Life doesn’t wind up in this category, but let’s just set that aside for right now and agree that some games meet these criteria and that I don’t enjoy them.
Continue reading ⟩⟩ “The Bro Shooter”
From The Archives:
Fixing Match 3
For one of the most popular casual games in existence, Match 3 is actually really broken. Until one developer fixed it.
Joker's Last Laugh
Did you anticipate the big plot twist of Batman: Arkham City? Here's all the ways the game hid that secret from you while also rubbing your nose in it.
Starcraft 2: Rush Analysis
I write a program to simulate different strategies in Starcraft 2, to see how they compare.
Patreon!
Why Google sucks, and what made me switch to crowdfunding for this site.
Starcraft: Bot Fight
Let's do some scripting to make the Starcraft AI fight itself, and see how smart it is. Or isn't.
Push the Button!
Scenes from Half-Life 2:Episode 2, showing Gordon Freeman being a jerk.
Pixel City Dev Blog
An attempt to make a good looking cityscape with nothing but simple tricks and a few rectangles of light.
The Plot-Driven Door
You know how videogames sometimes do that thing where it's preposterously hard to go through a simple door? This one is really bad.
The Best of 2017
My picks for what was important, awesome, or worth talking about in 2017.
Trusting the System
How do you know the rules of the game are what the game claims? More importantly, how do the DEVELOPERS know?