Half-Life 2

By Shamus Posted Saturday Jan 14, 2006

Filed under: Movies 17 comments

As I’ve mentioned before, I am not exactly what you would call a “fan” of Steam, the service used to safeguard Half-Life 2 against nefarious piracy. I am, however, partial to the game itself. So let’s take as look at what might happen if the game were to become a movie. Remember, this is just for fun. I am in no way suggesting that this would be a good idea.

So let’s get started…

Gordon Freeman

Deciding who would “play” Dr. Gordon Freeman is a bit strange. In a first-person game, the main character is the one you never see unless you look in a mirror. Gordon has no dialog, no personality, and is defined solely by his actions.

How does he feel about being regarded as a messiah? How does he feel about his role in opening the door to another dimension, or about his place as the puppet of the G-man? How does he feel about Alyx, or his fellow scientists? The answer, of course, is “however you think he feels”, since you play him in the game.

So, we might as well choose the actor to play this role based on looks alone. Ethan Hawke looks like a good match.

G-Man

The G-man is an enigma in the game. Who’s side is he on, anyway?

His two most notable features are his gaunt appearance and his strange, off-beat speaking cadence. For the gaunt, remorseless look, you can’t go wrong with Christopher Walken. For the odd pauses and menacing delivery, I might suggest Alan Rickman.

Alyx Vance

My favorite thing about Alyx’s character is that she seems real. The obvious thing for video games or movies to do is to take the female lead and whore her up. You know: Hot pants, tube tops, and high kicks. (Or leather and guns.) But no, she doesn’t have a gravity-defying bosom and strut through enemy base in high heels. Alyx is dressed in practical, durable clothing that fits her character and lifestyle as a member of the resistance. She isn’t wearing makeup. This sounds mundane, but video game females wearing freshly applied glossy lipstick into combat is so common that this borders on revolutionary. The rest of her shows the same attention to the authentic. More time was spent animating her eyes and mouth than her boobs and ass. This shows that her creators take her seriously, which lets the rest of us take her seriously.

To play Alyx, we can go with the obvious mainstream choice and use Halle Berry. She’s a great actress and playing the tough yet feminine Alyx is right up her alley.

As an alternate, I might suggest, Gina Torres, who plays Zoe on the ill-fated TV show Firefly. The way she looked when heading into combat reminds me a lot of Alyx.

Eli Vance

Robert Guillaume did the voice for Dr. Vance in the game, and as an added bonus looks like Dr. Vance, so I can’t think of a reason to use anyone else. The only nitpick is that Eli Vance ought to be about 50 or so, and Guillaume is nearly 80. However, he’s a robust 80, could pass for 60, and looks young enough to be Alyx’s father if he started late.

Barney Calhoun

Gary Sinise is the best choice I can come up with, although he’s not a perfect fit. He’s a bit too old and seems a bit too smart for Barney. He does have the right accent and the honest, down-to-earth delivery the part calls for. I keep thinking there has to be a better choice. Heather suggested that a young Matthew Broderick would look closer, but that would seem to sacrifice attitude and delivery for looks.

I’m betting there is a closer match that I haven’t thought of yet.

Dr. Kleiner

At first I thought I could be funny and suggest Bill Nye for this. He’s got that geek vibe the role needs. Hearing Bill Nye the Science Guy explaining the nonsense teleport mumbo-jumbo as if he was talking about real science should be good for a laugh, which is the whole point of Dr. Kleiner anyway.

But for looks I think a closer match is Bill Nighy. (Strange coincidence that the names are similar) I think that once you get the glasses and the lab coat on him he should look just fine. However, his voice is too deep, and he’s a brit. So, the choice: The right voice / vibe with Bill Nye, or the right appearance with Bill Nighy.

Dr. Breen

Like many of the greatest villians, Wallace Breen does not believe himself to be a bad person. He is much like the frenchmen who thought the best they could do in WWII was help their Nazi conquerers and hope they are treated well in return. He’s pragmatic, yet foolish and gutless. He’s a bureaucrat who aids the aliens in their conquest of Earth, in the hopes that someday the ends will justify his grotesque means. The typical Hollywood approach to someone like this would be to simplify the character and make him plain, easy-to-understand evil. You could give such a role to Christopher Lee and turn Breen into a cruel and calculating despot.

However, to stay true to the nature of Dr. Breen, you’d need someone who usually plays heroes. Someone who would otherwise be genuine and likeable. I’m open to suggestions.

Father Grigory

Good luck getting someone like Sean Connery to play a bit part like this. He’s a good fit anyway, and could pull off the odd graveyard humor Grigory uses.

 


 

Probabalistic Systems

By Shamus Posted Friday Jan 13, 2006

Filed under: Nerd Culture 2 comments

Kaedrin has a post about probabalistic systems (a new word for me, although I’m familiar with the concept) like Amazon.com recomendations, weblogs, Netflix movie ratings, and any other systems governed by mass input instead of authoritve control. Of all the systems I’ve mentioned, only one – weblogs, and the way they link to one another – is a truly “natural” system free of any tampering.

What weblogs exist, what information they contain, and how they link to one another, cannot be controlled. This is different from Wikipedia, Netflix, Amazon.com ratings, emusic ratings, and a host of other content feedback systems. The weblog system is spontaneous and naturally occurring. Glen Reynolds might not be your cup of tea (I don’t read him myself) but he’s the most popular political blogger (or was, last time a I checked, cut me some slack here I’m making a point) and there is absolutely nothing you can do to change that aside from making your own blog and being better than he is. And by better, I mean, better in the eyes of everyone else. You can’t fiddle with the system because there is no central point of control. It is the result of millions of people making their own decisions. This is different from the other systems, which are driven by software, and are usually hosted on a particular set of servers. They are, in fact, “owned” by someone. (For you young kids, I’m simply using an archaic spelling of the word “pwn3d”.)

One thing I haven’t seen yet that I keep expecting, is for the systems that are owned to experience a certain degree of cheating. Consider:

You’re a company like Amazon.com. You buy a million red widgets and a million blue widgets. You make a better margin on the blue ones, but it turns out that the red widgets are just a little better in quality. So the feeback for red is a little better. Which leads to red being reccomended more often than blue, which leads to better sales, more feedback, and even more recomendations. Now you’re down to your last 100,000 red but you still have 500,000 blue.

Now comes the moment of truth: Do you cheat? You’d rather sell blue. You see that you could “nudge” the numbers in the feedback system. You own the software, pay the programmers who maintain it, and control the servers on which the system is run. You could easily adjust things so that blue reccomendations appear more often, even though they are less popular. When Amazon comes up with “You might also enjoy… A blue widget” a customer has no idea of the numbers behind it. You could have the system try to even things out between the more popular red and the more profitable blue.

Does this really happen? I have no idea. I’m not really accusing Amazon of anything so much as pointing out that, in general, owned systems like this are easy to tamper with and offer a lot of incentives for the owner to do so. When Netflix suggests a movie to me that I don’t like, I never think, “Wow. this system isn’t working very well”. Instead I think, “I wonder how much money Netflix was paid to pimp this lame movie”. I guess I’m just really cynical, but these systems are made to attract customers and generate revenue. If a little hard-to-detect inaccuracy can mean more revenue, I don’t see why the systems wouldn’t be “tweaked”.

But how much can you cheat? How far can you push it before some clever guy proves it and posts his findings on Slashdot? That’s a tough call. (It reminds me a bit of the problem facing Waterhouse and Turing in the book Cryptonomicon. How much can we use this information to our advantage, without revealing that we are using this information?) Over time, when your fiddling goes undetected, you will have an incentive to keep pushing it, and moving the numbers even more in order to unload unwanted inventory or to favor suppliers in exchange for money. Each time you tweak the system, it becomes just a tiny bit less useful to the customer, but also more profitable for you. You always have an incentive to tilt things a little more, and you don’t know where the line of detection is.

It is possible that all of these sytems are driven by pure numbers and have never been messed with. However, just knowing what I outline above makes me trust them less.

 


 

Gamespotted

By Shamus Posted Friday Jan 13, 2006

Filed under: Rants 17 comments

An advantage of having my domain is that whenever I sign up for a web site that requires registration, I use the site name in my sign-up email address. If I sign up for espn, I’ll give them [email protected]*. (I get the email no matter what I use for the beginning of the address) This means if they misuse my address or are careless with it in such a way that I start getting spam, I can tell who did it.

Six days ago I signed up for Gamespot. I only did this because there was a file they had that I wanted to download, and I couldn’t get it anywhere else.

This morning I got the following email:

`Greetings!

My name is Joseph Ngoho
I am sorry for the unusual approach but I have acquired
your email address (gamespot@shamusy0ung.com)
as a person who is actively involved or is `looking for an
online `Business `Opportunity.

If this is the case I would be grateful if you would allow
me to send you details of an `opportunity that I am currently
involved in at the moment.

I did not want to send you any details until I had mailed
you to seek your `permission first,as experience has taught
me that not all leads that we acquire are genuine`Business
`Opportunity Seekers, If this is the case for you then please
ignore this email as you have already been excluded from
future mailing from me.

If however It would be ok to send you details of my
`Opportunity then please send an email to
"[email protected]" with "MORE_INFO" in the
subject line and your Name in the text body, without this I cannot
send you any further information I am afraid.

So why not give it a try?... it's`FREE anyway!...
Just give me a chance to show you how our program
works.

You can cancel your membership anytime you want.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Thank you very much for your time and your cooperation,

God Bless You and your Family

Yours sincerely,

Joseph Ngoho
mailto: [email protected]

To no longer receive any important information from us, just reply
‘NOT INTERESTED'to [email protected].

Nothing like a business proposition that begins with subverting your anti-spam with bad punctuation, opens with an obvious lie, insults your intelligence, and ends with insincere closing. I also note that he uses three different email addresses here, all of which are different from the actual return address of the email. I love how the email for suckers is seperate from the email for “unsubscribers”. I betting the latter leads right to the bit bucket.

So it took Gamespot no time at all to sell my email. It might have been sold the same day I signed up. And they didn’t just sell it to some game or computer hardware company, but sold it to some sleazy filthy scammer. It has gotten to the point where we expect legit sites to send us “updates” in the mail when they have new banner ads they want us to see, but simply selling user emails to operations like this? That is low. Really low.

You know I have a winning online marketing strategy for you: sell me the home address of these idiots. I’d pay good money to know where I could find them. I’ll bet unsubscribing is easier in person. With a baseball bat. And then tell me where I can find these whores at Gamespot.

Punks.

* I replaced the letter “o” in my address in this post with a zero, to defeat spiders. I mention this just to avoid confusion.

 


 

Playstation 3

By Shamus Posted Wednesday Jan 11, 2006

Filed under: Game Reviews 5 comments

At a time when you can get a half-decent PC for $300 comes the news that the Playstation 3 may cost around $500.

I find it interesting that this rumor appeared after Christmas, and after the XBox 360 recall. I suspect the brains at Sony were watching very carefully how things played out for the XBox. They watched, they saw the mistake, decided the XBox was weak, and it was safe to aim the price point a bit high. This would be true if XBox was the only threat to sales, but it isn’t.

As long as I can remember, PC’s have cost at least double what you might spend on a new console. Now PC’s are cheaper all of a sudden? This is a major shift. Make no mistake: the PS3 has lots of impressive technology for that (still-rumored) $500, but that is still a very tough price. This is a big-boy toy here. Not many parents are going to slap down that much for what is, a its heart, a toy. Not when you can get a machine that will play (last year’s) games, surf the net, do word processing, email and all the other stuff a PC can do, all for a little cheaper. The PS3 is going to be the plaything of bachelors and rich kids if this turns out to be true.

Me? My bachelor days are over. I have three kids and a Gamecube.

 


 

Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

By Shamus Posted Tuesday Jan 10, 2006

Filed under: Movies 14 comments

I’m going to break the very first rule of Dream Cast and propose a recently completed movie. Sue me.

HHGTTG was a lackluster movie. The writing was the worst, but the casting didn’t excite me, either. Let’s re-cast the movie. I bet we can do way better. Let’s stipulate that Arthur and Trillian need to be brits, but the other characters – who are all from outer space – need not have Brittish accents. Let’s also stipulate that we have to replace the whole cast. This would be too lame to keep some actors from the movie, even if some of them were good choices.

Hugh Grant as Arthur Dent. Martin Freeman was a perfect choice, but Hugh isn’t bad for the part, either. He’s made a career out of playing Perpetually Dumbfounded Englishmen and that’s what the role calls for. Sure, he’s too good-looking and a bit old for the part now, but I think he could still pull it off.
Johnny Depp as Ford Prefect. Ford is supposed to be a writer and a party animal. Sort of a young outer-space Hunter S. Thompson. Depp could pull off the quirky and eccentric Ford easily.
Howard Stern as Zaphod Beeblebrox. A perfect match. Look at him! He is Zaphod Beeblebrox! Just give him a second head in CGI and let him ad-lib all his dialog. He wouldn’t even need to read the books, the script, or know what the hell the story is about.
Steven Wright as the voice of Marvin. Just imagine Steven’s voice doing Marvin’s dialog. It’s funny already.
Ian McKellen as Slartibartfast. We’ve seen him play Gandalf, so I doubt playing Slartibartfast is much of a stretch from there. The fact that Sir Ian McKellen is a serious Shakespearian-style actor would only reinforce the absurdity of Slartbartfast’s character and speech.
Kate Ashfield as Trillian. Kate has made 34 appearances in her career, but the only thing she’s done that I’ve seen is Liz in the outstanding Shaun of the Dead.

Trillian is an odd character to nail down. She’s grounded enough to have something as dull as an astrophysics degree and acts as one of the most level-headed and sensible characters in the books, yet she runs off with Zaphod, the biggest party animal in a billion worlds. This means that amongst all of the outer-space wierdness we find ourselves with an all-too-familiar situation: why is this intelligent and capable woman hanging out with this self-destructive loser? Kate Ashfield tackled a character a lot like this when she played Liz, and I think it would work here as well.

Think I’m screwing it all up again? Leave a comment.

 


 

Do you want fries with that?

By Shamus Posted Monday Jan 9, 2006

Filed under: Nerd Culture 1 comments

So, some goofballs decided to build a computer that was submerged in 8 gallons of cooking oil. The idea is that the large volume of non-conductive liquid can absorb a lot of heat and eliminate the need for fans. Amazingly, it works. The computer is totally silent.

Although: Imagine what a hassle it will be if you need to do any upgrades. Want to put a network card (doesn’t look like you have one in there) into this machine? Enjoy reaching into oil up to your elbows. Also, this sucker is going to be heavy. I hope you don’t need to move it anytime soon.

However, this is just proof-of-concept. I bet with the right case you could achive the same effect using a fraction of the oil used here. I don’t know how much liquid you need to be able to absorb the heat, but I’m thinking 8 gallons is overkill. How little could you get away with? Cases are built to be more or less open inside to allow airflow. With this design, it might be sensible to try to eliminate all the empty space (fill it in with something airtight) to reduce the need for so much oil.

With all thoat oil inside, tipping is a real danger. Also, it looks like the power supply can’t be submerged.

How do people think of stuff like this?

 


 

Cowboy Bebop

By Shamus Posted Monday Jan 9, 2006

Filed under: Movies 9 comments

Let’s do another Dream Cast. If Cowboy Bebop were made into a live-action movie, who would play the main characters? I suggest:

Nick Stahl as the fearless, lanky, pointy-nosed Spike Spigel. Spike isn’t fearless because he thinks he’s indestructable, he’s fearless because he doesn’t seem to care what happens to him. Stahl could both look and act the part, assuming he’s up for the stunts and martial arts.

Ron Glass as the wise, strong, and patient Jet. Jet is tricky because he’s older, yet muscular. Check out some of the scenes from Firefly where Book and Jamie are lifting weights. Ron glass is ripped for a guy his age. He looks and sounds the part. I’d love to see him do it.
AnnaSophia Robb as the clever and curious Radical Edward. (Who is a girl) AnnaSophia starred in Because of Win-Dixie as well as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, and she’s brilliant. She’d have to do the part soon, though: she’ll be too old in a couple of years.

Kirsten Dunst as the irresponsible, trashy, gambling-addict Faye. A young Sharon Stone would be even better, but I think Dunst could pull it off without us needing to resort to time-travel or cloning.

Heather points out that Angelina Jolie is a much better choice if you want trashy. She’s too old, but doesn’t look too old. She’s better than Dunst, anyway.