A humorous morning diversion: Gizoolgle. Check it out: Twenty Sided Shizzle.
And one more: Mirror Universe Steven Den Beste.
Hat tip: Ragged Thots
A humorous morning diversion: Gizoolgle. Check it out: Twenty Sided Shizzle.
And one more: Mirror Universe Steven Den Beste.
Hat tip: Ragged Thots
Steven Den Beste (who shuns the use of permalinks, making the preceeding link of little use) talks about how his thing on The Matrix that I linked to the other day is getting major traffic.
I know this feeling. Back in 2003 I maintained The Lemon, an Onion-ish political site. I got several Instapundit links, as well as many links from other big-name bloggers. The site enjoyed a lot of positive traffic from political bloggers, but all of it was a drop in the bucket compared to the day when Slashdot and FARK both linked to this non-political bit I did on the history of the internet. It was a soul-crushing avalanche of traffic that eclipsed all previous links.
While Political blogs top the Technorati charts and the term “blogosphere” is often used to mean the political blogs, I think the above proves that political blogs are just a small but very active part of the ‘net. The political blogosphere (both left and right) is quite prolific and inbred. (By inbred I mean they have lots of links going to each other. I’m not saying anything about their families, which I’m sure are all fine, fine people.) It generates an incredible volume of traffic amongst itself, but for the most part I think they are ignored by non-political junkies.
Some other notes on the political bloggers vs. “everyone else”:
Now that I’m thinking about it: I should update that timeline, there is about 3 more years of history to add.
My new computer arrived today. For the curious, I got this machine. Not top-of-the-line by any stretch of the imagination, but it’s a good machine for the price, IMO.
Last time I got a computer it was an HP, and the avalanche of popup windows and pre-installed nonsense was so infuriating that I swore I’d never buy a big-brand machine again. This time I ALMOST got a no OS machine and a seperate license of XP as some people suggested. Then I got lazy and just ordered one with XP already installed. Later I got worried: What if this turned into a repeat of last time? I couldn’t bear the thought of going through that again.
Luckily, the annoyware was minimal. I didn’t need to un-install a single thing. No stupid toolbars, no system tray lunacy, no surprises. Only one program was pushy, and it behaved once I put it in its place. Everything else worked perfectly and was sensibly configured.
Also, why would you name DVD software “CyberLink”? The name is very misleading, as it sounds like it has something to do with being, you know, linked to something.
When I was younger and poorer, I used to hang onto my computers for as long as I could. They hung around for ages, and I upgraded them as needed to keep them useable. I didn’t have nice furniture or a lot of space, so the box usually sat on the floor at my feet, and was moved around frequently. The upshot is that usually when I retired an old computer the thing looked like it had (just barely) survived combat. When I finally moved to a new machine the old one was usually so obsolete and abused that it was rarely fit for any kind of service. However, this most recent computer has only been in service for two years, and I think I’ve only opened the case once. It still looks brand new. It runs fine (well, it runs as well as it did when it was new, which means nothing else has broken since then) and there are only a couple of games out there that it won’t run.
I’d post pictures of the new machine, but who cares? Aside from the pimped-out gaming computers, they all look alike these days. See that computer you’re using? Yeah, mine looks like that only it’s a different shade of grey.
Of all my puzzles, this is the only one I’ve never solved. In my defense, it’s hard to work with. It’s stiff and difficult to turn, and after a few minutes my fingers hurt from the effort. Not a very fun puzzle to experiment with.
On the other hand, it is very visually appealing. Lots of bright primary colors and a surface with just the right texture make it hard to resist picking the thing up.
Let’s be honest here: For anyone who’s been around bright and colorful infant toys, you know that many of them are attractive and amusing. It’s fun to pick them up and make them spin or beep or rotate or whatever it is the toy does. It isn’t any less fun to hold for an adult (although it’s not nearly as amazing or mysterious for us) but sensible adults (read: not me) shun them because you don’t want to get caught playing with a baby toy.
So a lot of the attraction of these puzzles is the same visual and tactile experience of the baby toy, along with the more cerebral process of solving a difficult puzzle. If you don’t believe me, just imagine how much less fun a Rubik’s Cube would be if it was made of wood and the sides were shades of grey, or simply numbered. The puzzle would still be there, but the “baby toy” appeal would be gone, and it would be much easier to put the thing down.
Via Eidelblog I find this post, which in turn led me to a bit from Robert Hayes, where he makes the case that the Rebellion in Star Wars is evil, and the Empire is flawed but not nearly as bad. It makes for an interesting read.
Which got me thinking about some other recent sci-fi movies. Take, for example:
So my point: What is up with these lefty Hollywood statists (read: commies) and their libertarian / individualist themed movies? Outside of the movies, they gaze up at the massive edifice of government power and lament that it isn’t nearly big enough. Then they go back to making their stories about overthrowing the state and freeing the individual. How do they reconcile these two?
![]() LEFT: Palpatine (who looks like Lieberman to me) favors a large and highly centralized government. RIGHT: Smash the state! Now, who would Clooney normally vote for? |
I wouldn’t expect the Cato Institute to bankroll a movie where the heroes defeat a band of rebellious capitalists and bring about an egalitarian utopia, and I don’t expect the Hollywood types to keep dry-humping individualisim and limited government onscreen while pursuing (ahem) other goals.
What’s up with that?
![]() |
So what DID happen inside of Rockstar studios during the development of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas? In an earlier post I talked about why the Hot Coffee minigame ended up on the final disc. But what made them abandon it in the first place? They put some development (and thus money) time into it, and even successful game studios like Rockstar are going to be reluctant to throw away money. What happened?
Some possible explanations:
Of course, there is no way to know for sure, but these are my guesses.
This morning was a new record: Ninety (90!!!) spam comments from one “person”. Amazing. His bot left comments on over half the posts on this site. My spam-filter caught them all and held them for moderation, but I still had to go through the list and make sure no real comments got caught in the net.
This is crazy. I’ve rejected every spam he’s fired at my site, and he (his bot) seems to respond by sending MORE. It seems like it would be in a spammer’s best interest to detect where their spam gets through and where it doesn’t, and to skip sites that block it. Wouldn’t this guy prefer to save his time and bandwidth for sites that are vulnerable?
Den Beste was nice enough to suggest .htaccess files as a way to deal with this, which is a very arcane form of black magic used to control Apache webservers. He warned that the config could be a little tricky. He was a not kidding. Even if Steve Wozniak and Harry Potter teamed up to help me, I don’t think I could get this working right. Sigh.
I said before that my web hosting service doesn’t let me block IP addresses. Look closely at the following image and see if you can spot the tool that might help me with this:
![]() |
I’m an idiot. I can’t believe I didn’t see it before. Particularly since I WAS LOOKING FOR IT. I can’t believe I’ve been manually sorting spam with this tool sitting there, unused.
So I blocked the offending IP’s, and I expect that will take a big, big bite out of the spam I have to look at every morning.
Jerks.
UPDATE: Looks like it really works. In the last 24 hours I’ve had to deal with 4 spam comments. So, about 98% of my spam was coming from the small group of IP’s I banned. Very satisfying.
The story of me. If you're looking for a picture of what it was like growing up in the seventies, then this is for you.
Back in 1999, I rode the dot-com bubble. Got rich. Worked hard. Went crazy. Turned poor. It was fun.
This Korean title would be the greatest MMO ever made if not for the horrendous monetization system. And the embarrassing translation. And the terrible progression. And the developer's general apathy towards its western audience.
Scenes from Half-Life 2:Episode 2, showing Gordon Freeman being a jerk.
A game about the ghost of an underwater football player who travels through time to save the world from a tick that controls kaiju satan. Really.
No, game prices don't "need" to go up. That's not how supply and demand works. Instead, the publishers need to be smarter about where they spend their money.
No Man's Sky is a game seemingly engineered to create a cycle of anticipation and disappointment.
Lists of 'best games ever' are dumb and annoying. But like a self-loathing hipster I made one anyway.
Some advice to game developers on how to stop ruining good stories with bad cutscenes.
Grand Theft Auto is a lousy, cheating jerk of a game.