Simpsons Catch-Up Binge: Flanderization

By Ethan Rodgers Posted Saturday Apr 18, 2026

Filed under: Epilogue, EthanIRL 4 comments

Recently I started watching the Simpsons from Season 1 forward after I had the terrible realization that there were episodes from the “golden years” that I had never seen. I didn’t get into the Simpsons until my middle school years when it was syndicated and shown on TBS after school every day. It was my background show I watched when I did my homework. I got a couple of the box sets of DVDs back in the day but never actually got around to watching any except the very first episode back then.

Now, with the power of disgusting corporate conglomeration into a monopolistic monstrosity I can watch the whole series on Disney+. My goal is to catch all the way up. Thirty-seven seasons of wildly varying content. I want to see where things went wrong and where they start to pull back together, as I actually like some of the newer episodes I’ve seen here and there. So far I’m just up to Season 4 and I have to say, the term “flanderization” is off the mark.

Season 1 Ned Flanders was the All-American perfect neighbor with the beautiful house, yard, wife, and kids. He was everything Homer wanted to be, which is what made him so mad. Cut to Season 3 Ned Flanders. Same guy except now we know he’s religious and featured more frequently. That small change has been seen as so drastic and so wild as a shift that it birthed its own page on TV tropes and spawned many a video essay. But I think that reaction is unearned and misguided. With Flanders it really just feels like a natural evolution. We knew he was a goody-two-shoes, so it only makes sense that he would get his strict moral character from somewhere. Religion feels like a solid direction for it to have come from. The complaint people tend to have is that his character gets boiled down to nothing but a side character for religious jokes, but I don’t really see that at all. We regularly learn more about Ned and get spotlights showing more about his character over the seasons. There is an episode or two that feature Ned that have made me cry. He’s got depth.

If there’s any character that becomes flanderized, it’s Homer. Season 1 Homer is a bit shlubby and dopey, but you can see his love and appreciation for his family immediately. Season 3 Homer is a dangerous idiot. Season 3 Homer shouldn’t have a family because Season 3 Marge should have left and taken the kids away from him. I love watching him and his antics, but it’s an aggressive shift from a well-meaning teddy bear to selfish “jerkass” with no real reason or explanation other than the fact that The Simpsons is an animated sitcom.

I think that maybe people see the lowering quality of Simpsons writing and try to come up with explanations that are more complicated than reality. It really could be that writers found other jobs and people’s interest in the show fatigued. The product eventually got less appealing, but when does it really make that shift?

I’m going to find out. I’m committed. I know that at some point later on I’ll have to disassociate my way through the Simpsons writers’ room trying to be topical and edgy in a way that feels very “How do you do, fellow kids?” I will get through it. I am strong enough. If I need you to send help I’ll start writing in haikus.

I have started this
Journey whose end is far off
Mistake made? Likely

 


From The Archives:
 

4 thoughts on “Simpsons Catch-Up Binge: Flanderization

  1. Mark says:

    I think this is missing the point of the term, which isn’t about the difference between season 1 and season 4, but season 4 and season 10.

    1. Syal says:

      Yeah, Flanders gets a lot worse. The Flowers For Algernon episode in Season 12 had the standout moment for me.

      1. Ethan Rodgers says:

        Yep yep you guys are very right. lol. I had heard there was a massive shift already by season 3 or 4, but things definitely take a turn a bit later on. My next post chronicling my binge will likely be titled “Nah I Get The Hate Now.”

  2. PPX14 says:

    My gf wasn’t allowed to watch Simpsons as a child, and has now watched through all 37 series either twice or thrice and is on the next watch through. There are enough episodes that by the time she gets to the end, it’s time to start from the beginning again. I find it odd too that Flanders is specifically the one chosen for the name of the trope, I always think that Skinner’s flanderisation was a shame, from competent do-the-right-thing well-meaning person, with a green-beret past hiding a tough streak under his goodie-two-shoes demeanour, to awkward hopeless helpless pathetic and cowardly.

Thanks for joining the discussion. Be nice, don't post angry, and enjoy yourself. This is supposed to be fun. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

You can enclose spoilers in <strike> tags like so:
<strike>Darth Vader is Luke's father!</strike>

You can make things italics like this:
Can you imagine having Darth Vader as your <i>father</i>?

You can make things bold like this:
I'm <b>very</b> glad Darth Vader isn't my father.

You can make links like this:
I'm reading about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth_Vader">Darth Vader</a> on Wikipedia!

You can quote someone like this:
Darth Vader said <blockquote>Luke, I am your father.</blockquote>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *