Witchers aren’t in Witch watch. No, really….

By Patrick The mostly harmless Posted Friday Jun 26, 2026

Filed under: Game Reviews, Epilogue, Patrick 0 comments

A general recap is a good idea before we dive into new DLC. It has been 11 years.

Full disclosure: I’ve read the books. I *highly recommend* reading the books. Some games derived from existing novels it isn’t needed, doesn’t add anything. We don’t need to read every Batman comic to understand Arkham asylum. In this case, the game is more enjoyable once you are familiar with the lore, characters, and relationships. CDPR did an amazing job weaving canon into gameplay without sacrificing either. Which is really hard to do, as anyone who’s ever played a Star Wars game can tell you. Without reading the books Dandelion feels out of place, a Shakespearean character thrust into a Grimm fairy tale. Yennefer, Regis, Djikstra…. the game barely scrapes the surface.

CDPR commitment to staying true to Sapkowski’s creation, while still making the game playable without reading it, is harder than it seems. Not everyone has the time (or inclination) to read seven novels just to be able to enjoy an RPG. Nor should it be expected. That said, I went two playthroughs without reading the books and thought it was great. After reading the novels it was so much better. And honestly, funnier.

For those of you who have inexplicably (borderline criminally) never played the game:

Witcher III is massive. It’s roughly twice the size of GTA V, 5-6x larger than Fallout 4. Witcher III has over 1,500 unique NPC’s. If you ignore all side quests, bulldoze main quests, you can play through the main story in 35-40 hours. If you explore, go treasure hunting, complete side quests, play copious amounts of Gwent (you will) and scavenger hunts you could get closer to 200 and not be bored. ‘Blood and Wine’ and ‘Hearts of Stone’ DLC add 70-80 hours. There are a few tedious points (like sailing that damn boat all over Skellige), but for the most part it keeps you centered, moving from one objective to the next without feeling monotonous.

What I enjoyed most was it balanced grim reality of a re-imagined 13th century Europe, humor, drama, love, tragedy, horror, regret and full range of human emotions. Most RPGs beat you over the head with non-stop morbidity. They pick one aspect of the human condition and beat that drum for the entire game. By the end you’re numb to it. Like FO4, with endless moral dilemmas that give you nothing but different tragic outcomes. CDPR has a few of those too, but also lets you drunk dial a sorceress while wearing your girlfriend’s yoga pants. There’s balance. Variety.

The soundtrack is a character all its own. Music exists in the background, adding nuance to each unique area. Sometimes haunting, sometimes tense and foreboding, other times whimsical. In Skellige there’s Gaelic and Celtic notes, adding to the background without being intrusive. In dungeons the music stops, and the silence surrounds you.

Voice acting is unparalleled in terms of scale. Hundreds of minor characters tied to main story arcs who each have their own voice, not the same 6 people using a different pitch. Accents are consistent from beginning to end. They never wane, never falter. Complex emotions that usually require body language and facial expressions (sarcasm, empathy) are conveyed convincingly. Elves sound elvish, not a guy from Redondo Beach pretending to be British. Nilfgaardians have the same harsh accent. Everyone in Skellige sounds like they are from Skellige. Which is hard to do, since none of that shit exists. It takes a collaborative effort to get a few dozen voice actors together to decide what a Nilfgaardian sounds like. They made a conscious effort to make something narratively consistent. How many other studios would make that effort? Bethesda would hire a Russian Uber driver, pay him $50 and call it a day.

Graphically, 11 years later, it’s still relevant. Anyone picking up a controller for their first playthrough wouldn’t think the game feels dated. Admittedly we are getting closer to cinematic reality, so the advancements in graphics are incremental. Not like the gigantic leaps we saw from 2002 to 2013. Still, having a game remain relevant (graphically) for over a decade is pretty rare.

I spent time reading reviews (not something I usually do) and the only real complaints was the game was “to big” and had “to much dialogue.” Which makes no sense to me. I mean… It’s a medieval fantasy RPG? That’s like complaining how the 74th iteration of CoD has “to many guns”. Yeah, the inventory system is annoying. But really, when has there ever been a game where anyone said “meh, it kinda sucked, but hot damn the inventory system really carried the game!!”? Not every game can have a horadric cube.

The only complaint I saw that made (some) sense was the combat system was repetitive. And it was. For the record, I liked it. I’m not sure why people crave new and creative ways to slaughter a nest of nekkers, but everyone has a preference. As with the inventory, I’ve never heard of a game with a combat system that everyone liked.

Personally, my only complaint with the game was (this is gonna sound really petty) the peasants bugged the shit out of me. Yes… the peasants.

See…. Geralt is a Witcher. That probably sounds sinister, and admittedly Geralt does look like a half-dead Keanu Reeves after a 10-year meth bender. But Witchers are actually pretty awesome dudes.

The Witcher class is a highly trained, dying profession of mutated humans. They are stronger, faster, can see in the dark, heal quickly and are immune to disease. Which is really helpful since tuberculosis is more common than surviving childhood and even the rats have polio. Witchers sacrifice (usually unwillingly) their chance to live a normal life, the capacity for love and joy, the chance to have children, all so the people can tend to their mud farm without being shredded by monsters. There’s a lot of those.

Or have their village raped and plundered (again) by one army or another. The forests are filled with packs of feral dogs and wolves. There’s even more of those. Starvation seems common. The church is corrupt. The ruling monarchs are sadistic, murdering rapists. Seems like a place where a comfortable pair of shoes is worth selling your least favorite child for. You would think these illiterate fucking peasants external stakeholders with limited funding would be glad to see a mutated superhero willing to lend a hand. You would think.

Sadly, no. Even though Geralt is basically Wolverine, capable of murdering the entire village…. with a pointy stick, left-handed, blind-folded, while eating a sandwich…. the average Redanian spits as he walks by and insults him. Almost no one likes him. Which makes zero sense since Witchers are the only thing keeping humans from being eaten by vampires or fucked to death by a purple Succubus. Yes, those are both problematic.

I get that people might begrudge or distrust Witchers. They are ugly, emotionally detached and overpowered killing machines. I get that people wouldn’t feel comfortable around them. Definitely fear them. Might even outright hate them. But the sure as hell wouldn’t tell them that to their face. For the same reason a normie in the Marvel universe wouldn’t call Deadpool a walking dick joke to his face. Absolutely true, but that just wouldn’t end well. There’s 0.0% chance a non-suicidal, starving serf with more tapeworms than teeth would insult a Witcher within earshot.

Honestly, the only thing that kept me from murdering every grimy, barefoot churl in the game (with a pointy stick, left-handed, blindfolded) was a complete lack of pointy sticks. Well, that and the game mechanics. CDPR is not Interplay.

Point is, Geralt should be the most popular guy north of the Yaruga, instead he’s regarded as only slightly better than a flaming corpse asking to sleep with your sister. I balance this egregious social affront by walking into their mud huts and stealing everything. Even their broken rakes. There is an inexplicably large number of those.

Between casual home invasions, killing monsters, horse races, fight clubs, sleeping with every sorceress possible (I am a gigolo, TYVM) and collecting Gwent cards, Geralt finds time to save the world, fall in love, change the fate of four monarchies, and sleep with the hot Elf at the Passiflora 134 times. Well… I mean… that’s what he did in my play through. I don’t judge him though.

I was tempted to start a complete walkthrough, but that has been done once already on this site. The step by step is available if you need that much foreplay for Songs from the Past.

The aforementioned DLCs don’t necessarily have to be played in order. You can complete them before you even finish the main story arc. But ideally you finish the main game, then Hearts of Stone and finally Blood and Wine. At the end of the latter, Geralt’s mercurial vampire bestie Regis asks him if he plans to continue plying his trade, wandering from village to village stealing their rakes slaying monsters, or retire as a Vinter to a villa given as payment for killing a few hundred vampires. The released trailer shows him walking away from the vineyard, seemingly returning to The Path he retired from.

Personally, I would be thrilled if Geralt retired to Kaer Morhen and opened ‘Geralt’s used rake emporium’.

 


From The Archives:
 

Thanks for joining the discussion. Be nice, don't post angry, and enjoy yourself. This is supposed to be fun. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

You can enclose spoilers in <strike> tags like so:
<strike>Darth Vader is Luke's father!</strike>

You can make things italics like this:
Can you imagine having Darth Vader as your <i>father</i>?

You can make things bold like this:
I'm <b>very</b> glad Darth Vader isn't my father.

You can make links like this:
I'm reading about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth_Vader">Darth Vader</a> on Wikipedia!

You can quote someone like this:
Darth Vader said <blockquote>Luke, I am your father.</blockquote>

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *