Twitter has never been the most stable service. You’d think a service dedicated to serving up 140 bytes of text data at a time would be more resilient than (say) your average video streaming YouTube wannabe. The average 14 megabyte video will require one hundred thousand times the bandwidth as a tweet. Add to this the fact that video share sites allow you to search, rate, and comment on videos, and it’s clear that you’re dealing with a lot more than five orders of magnitude in difference. Yet the Twitter service winks out so much that it borders on narcoleptic. It’s just never made sense to me how Twitter has continued to be so shamefully wobbly over the past six months or so.
But now I see this story: Twitter knocked offline by DDoS attack. Amazing. A hacker has control of a botnet and the most daring thing he can come up with is to sucker-punch the hilariously feeble micro-blogging service? The world’s least ambitious hacker versus the world’s least stable website. Oh, which group of epic losers will prevail, and how will they make anyone care afterward?
Addendum: Follow me on twitter!
The No Politics Rule
Here are 6 reasons why I forbid political discussions on this site. #4 will amaze you. Or not.
Joker's Last Laugh
Did you anticipate the big plot twist of Batman: Arkham City? Here's all the ways the game hid that secret from you while also rubbing your nose in it.
PC Gaming Golden Age
It's not a legend. It was real. There was a time before DLC. Before DRM. Before crappy ports. It was glorious.
The Plot-Driven Door
You know how videogames sometimes do that thing where it's preposterously hard to go through a simple door? This one is really bad.
Bethesda’s Launcher is Everything You Expect
From the company that brought us Fallout 76 comes a storefront / Steam competitor. It's a work of perfect awfulness. This is a monument to un-usability and anti-features.